![]() ![]() Uncertainty tolerance is an important and complex phenomenon requiring more precise and consistent definition. We discuss how this model can facilitate further empirical and theoretical research to better measure and understand the nature, determinants, and outcomes of UT in health care and other domains of life. This model synthesizes insights from various disciplines and provides an organizing framework for future research. To address these gaps, we propose a new integrative definition and multidimensional conceptual model that construes UT as the set of negative and positive psychological responses-cognitive, emotional, and behavioral-provoked by the conscious awareness of ignorance about particular aspects of the world. A logically coherent, unified understanding or theoretical model of UT is lacking. The objectives of this study were to: 1) analyze the meaning and logical coherence of UT as conceptualized by developers of UT measures, and 2) develop an integrative conceptual model to guide future empirical research regarding the nature, causes, and effects of UT.Ī narrative review and conceptual analysis of 18 existing measures of Uncertainty and Ambiguity Tolerance was conducted, focusing on how measure developers in various fields have defined both the "uncertainty" and "tolerance" components of UT-both explicitly through their writings and implicitly through the items constituting their measures.īoth explicit and implicit conceptual definitions of uncertainty and tolerance vary substantially and are often poorly and inconsistently specified. On the contrary, coherence is relevant because of its dependence upon each individual's content and formal schemata.Uncertainty tolerance (UT) is an important, well-studied phenomenon in health care and many other important domains of life, yet its conceptualization and measurement by researchers in various disciplines have varied substantially and its essential nature remains unclear. It can thus be assumed that a text is not always one because the existence of coherence is not always a given. ![]() In other words, they are mental frameworks for the organization of information about the world. Schemata, subsequently distinguished into Formal and Content Schemata (in the field of TESOL ) are the ways in which the world is organized in our minds. Bartlett in 1932 which creates further implications for the notion of a "text". "Continuity of senses" implies a link between cohesion and the theory of Schemata initially proposed by F. But within this textual world the arguments also have to be connected logically so that the reader/hearer can produce coherence. Thereby a textual world is created that does not have to comply to the real world. Dressler define coherence as a "continuity of senses" and "the mutual access and relevance within a configuration of concepts and relations". It has been stated that a text coheres only if the world around is also coherent. However, those text-based features which provide cohesion in a text do not necessarily help achieve coherence, that is, they do not always contribute to the meaningfulness of a text, be it written or spoken. The purely linguistic elements that make a text coherent are subsumed under the term cohesion. Coherence is achieved through syntactical features such as the use of deictic, anaphoric and cataphoric elements or a logical tense structure, as well as presuppositions and implications connected to general world knowledge. It is especially dealt with in text linguistics. ( February 2021) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message)Ĭoherence in linguistics is what makes a text semantically meaningful. See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for suggestions. ![]() The reason given is: reasoned, academic style. ![]() This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |